Exodus wrote: ↑3 weeks ago
1- how does something like science explaining how the universe came to be through the big bang make a statement on WHY it came to be???? It literally is a vacuum. ALL it is a way of investigating things.
2 - stop browsing /pol/ thinking it's reality
3 - that's true but they're still 2 separate fields. You we're still taking a few scientists opinions to try to judge science as a whole. That's the people in the field not the field come on lol
4 - never said it was just skin color. You already know I'm not in that camp. But the division between dog breeds is a lot more firm than division between human races. How many times do I have to break this shit down? Playing dumb like I said lol. Dogs kept from each other, made to have sex for different specific traits, unlike humans where they were free to mix. Which did happen to create Arabs and Latinos who are basically 2 giant mixed races. Most everyone is mixed with different genetics, look at ancestry tests, whites have different mixes of kinds of European.
On top of all that human dna is a hell of a lot more complicated than dog DNA
1. Maybe this is brown IQ, but you're half-Indonesian half-Jew so you shouldn't really be having this hard of a time. Actually, never mind, it's the half-jew part I'm mostly talking to, isn't it? The implication of the big bang theory is that life is essentially an accident of a nature. The implications of that are that it is ultimately meaningless; void of any higher purposes. You're the one playing dumb in all this.
2. Sure bro. Stop browsing incel forums and get out there in the real world and actually touch a boobie before making all these claims about women and such.
3. Scientism exists as a logical outcome of science and the enlightenment. So you're whole "well that's not what it's about" is a fucking moot point.
Is the point of communism technically just to kill and starve people? No, but that's what happens anyway. So who fucking cares?
4. Again you are simply using incorrect information; baseless conjecture.
The races were not simply "free to mix" from the get-go as you want to believe (more on that in a second). Most Europeans are also not "mixed" (most people will be 100% of whatever ethnic group) and even if they are mixed with the other ethnic groups, it's like...you do know that most of us are descended from common ancestors and look almost indistinguishable right?
The idea that a person who is part celt and slav or part Germanic and celt is on par with a fuckin' mulatto or Mestizo is caved-in-head retarded. Anti-miscengenation laws exist(ed) for a reason and there is a reason why even with Moorish occupations and incursions into Europe, there wasn't any sand nigger or hybrid population of note in Europe until they were brought by Jews.
Further, the premise you assume is false. Your idea is that dog breeds are different ultimately because their breeding was actively forced.
Except it was still forced among humans too, albeit more passively. Even if we were to assume this was due to limited mobility or something. Being like 'Oh the races were free to mix and it wasn't forced" and therefore assuming the result
is different from eugenics when all of those people would've effectively been forced anyway on account of being isolated among their own for thousands of years is again just caved-in-head retard tier reasoning.
Let me explain simply what is happening here: You, like PJ & Jewfro, don't want to deal with your own fuck-ugly women and instead are trying to justify why you should be allowed to get with white women.
I'm going to protect my people, our heritage, our countries, our communities, and our right to exist as a unique race of people and not be bred out by browns and blacks, and if any of you have a problem with that, then fuck you