No you eventually answered my question but it took some effort, a lot of effort actually, and that's what makes me think you were evasive. You can get as emotional as you want about what evasive means, lying, duplicitous, whatever. That is what happened.Hairblues wrote: ↑1 year agoI’m not even sure what I’m not answering for you that makes you again brush off my points which I guess you will also find dublicitois or suspicious which is again implying I’m being shady with you.
The trump comparison?
I find it hypocrisy to support Trump, a man more than half the country at one time or another has been offended or outraged over his statements, a man whose pundits and staff have to constantly walk back his comments or explain what he really meant—yet automatically discredit a person over 1 comment and hold their feet to the fire over one comment or be upset over my lack of taking him seriously to a point you think I’m lying about it.
It seems like a double standard to me.
What examples do you want ?
Muslim Ban ( not its not an actual Muslim ban)
Mexican are rapists (no he didn’t mean all Muslims)
There are good and bad on both sides in chalotexville( no he didn’t mean that he meant the statue debate)
Grab them by the pussy (oh he’s just a guy being a guy)
Ted Cruz father and JFK connection (oh well silly)
Not lowering the flag when reporters were shot
Calling the free press fake news
Calling the FBI a 3rd state with no proof
Saying women should be punished for having abortion
Desiccating the EPA
Pardoning someone who outed a CIA operative
Taking the birther Movement and running with it
Implementing a policy to separate kids and parents then denying its his policy
I saw your repeated point about us disregarding a clip about Maher and I didn't care, I didn't care about the YouTube clip, the point had moved on and I wanted to talk about Maher.
You seem to have jumped to this conclusion that I deliberately won't acknowledge the clip you posted because it involves Maher, and no, I just didn't care about it. I'd already seen it before, can you now please stop going on about that? I'm not brushing it off, I don't have to acknowledge absolutely everything that happens before me in a thread, KJ brought up the Maher thing and I felt we hadn't discussed it. Simple as that.
OK when I asked for something he said I thought you could at least focus on one particular thing I've defended, that was the original point.