Pat wrote: ↑
3 months ago
Let's say I claim that my dick is 50cm and posted a picture of a huge donger. Should we reject the possibility that I'm lying?
A 50cm dick stretches credulity, though I might believe it if you had been discussing it for years. The Sagnoc story, however, does not stretch credulity. The US has substantial domestic violence terrorism, with some 12,000 gun fatalities per year, and a school shooting every week, for example. Just last year, we had Stephen Paddock shoot up 910 people in Las Vegas
There's been a rise in political violence and threats of violence for several years now. Back in the Obama years, people used to show up with guns to tea party rallies and signs that said "the tree of liberty is watered with the blood of tyrants." What do you think that they were implying? Do you think that they were talking about buying genetically-modified fertilizer?
Tell me Pat, if it's so unlikely that one of Trump's nutty supporters would go postal, how is it that I predicted that this would happen a few weeks back? Do you think that I'm in the CIA-Soros cabal and that I had inside knowledge? This is what I wrote in the Kavanaugh thread a few weeks back:
One thing that could help the democrats, for example, is if a nutjub decides to go kill 200 people with his guns before Election Day. That usually gets them good press. On the other hand, if somebody shoots a police officer, I'd expect that the opposite will happen.
It was an easy prediction.
People see nutcases like Sagnoc every so often in the USA. Lots of morons load up their cars are with tons of idiotic bumper stickers, they like for everybody to know about their juvenile politics. I sometimes see abortion trucks just riding around. I see guys ride their motorcycles with giant confederate flags. On another website, one of the female posters commented that Sagnoc's photos (of him bodybuilding, wearing tacky suits, etc) reminded her of a lot of OkCupid profiles of men in their 40s.
As for your points ...
Another thing which is funny is that when the unabomber was sending his mailbombs they never caught him untill he came back from retirement. But this guy is found instantly. There should be no doubt that a Trump supporter did this weeks before the midterms.
The Unabomber had an IQ of 167 which gave him the means to be a more effective criminal. Cesar Sagnoc ... I'm going to guess that his IQ is 87.
ery peculiar to make a bomb with PVC instead of traditional metal. Odd choice to put a watch on a detonator bomb, how would he know when it would be opened? Strange choice to send bombs in the mail to people who don't open their own mail. It's also very strange that with all of these bombs that no one was hurt. Strange for a right-winger to mail bombs to top democrats right before the election when that would only support their narrative.
Again, Sagnoc isn't very smart.
Perhaps you're unaware, but the reason that a lot of criminals and terrorists fail is that they're kind of dumb. They often and in fact typically make silly mistakes and get caught.