IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Discuss everything else: politics, society, culture, science, philosophy, ideas, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

P.S: Parts of this post are copied from outer sources, so not all of it is written by me. I just thought that it's worth sharing here because there's been a lot of coping lately about IQ from some insecure people who hate themselves with passion and want any form of an ego boost. But guess what ? You're not smart or special neither is your race and the IQ you brag about is all pseudoscience that doesn't hold any real meaning anyways.


IQ tests are practically a pseudoscience, and looking at them internationally is even more fallacious. Even if you translate the English IQ tests into other languages, there is no way that some tribesman in the Amazon will be able to complete an analogy that uses purely Western urban elements such as trains and conductors. As such, you have to make the IQ test culturally sensitive to the people which you are testing; at that point, the issue arises of comparing the scores from one test to another as there is no practical way to test the validity of any equivalency you try to create between them. What would need to happen is for each culturally sensitive IQ test to be stratified relative to the culture within which it is administered, meaning that the average IQ of every country would have to be 100 by definition. For a nation to be truly below 100 IQ on average, you would need to actively take people who scored less than 100 in one nation's IQ tests and deport all those people to a new country; however, if you were to re-administer an IQ test within that country in a vacuum, the average IQ would again be 100.

There isn't even a consensus on what intelligence is, so how can one create an objective measuring tool for it? You can't. What you cited - the "complete the pattern" and rotating objects mentally are testing two aspects of intelligence (specifically logical/mathematical and spatial) and ignore many others. One of the more prominent theories of why this is inadequate is Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: there are nine of them, according to him. Others have gone as far as 13 if I recall correctly. In order to accurately measure all of them you would have to complete a wide arrange of tasks, not all of which are culturally intersectional (like the example I listed with the Amazonian chief and the public transportation analogy, which measures a different type of intelligence - logic/mathematical in combination with linguistic). Yet others believe that there are only three types of intelligence, and your proposed format doesn't satisfy even those. What you're testing with the metrics you described can predict whether someone would be well-suited for an education in engineering or physics, but not if they would make a good philosopher, or writer, or historian, or many other professions, each of which can contain what would be considered very "intelligent" people. By your definition of intelligence, a blind person couldn't be intelligent, because you are basing intelligence and its metrics purely on visual recognition. That is pure hogwash.

As such, a truly universal IQ test would measure all of the various types of intelligence, which includes culturally-sensitive issues. Even if such a test were constructed, the demands of certain cultures have made it such that different peoples need to be better at different things in order to succeed. Of course an Amazonian warchief will suck at things that first-world white capitalists designed, just as they would suck on a test of hunting patterns, tracking, and plant identification that is designed by the Amazonian warchief. Trying to use the IQ tests designed to be taken by Americans and Europeans to measure the intelligence of other cultures makes the already questionable practice of measuring "intelligence" and grading it on a normalized curve even more suspect; comparing to the "European mean" is scientifically dishonest. Even if the Amazonian warchief scored highly on the metrics you proposed, that doesn't help make him more successful in his immediate surroundings and thus is a completely pointless metric to his life and abilities.

Remember that correlation is not causation. There are confounding variables which are far more likely to contribute to the metrics you listed - for example, people with higher IQ scores are likely to come from wealthier families. Also, using the argument that they've been around for 100 years is no argument at all. Flat-Earthers have been around for thousands of years, doesn't make their bullshit any more valid. Reliability is not validity, anyone who has taken any statistics ever will be able to tell you this.

But if you don't believe me, take it from the experts who in the past few decades have been discovering the culturally sensitive nature of IQ tests and thus their lack of validity as a comparative tool :
"On the one hand, mindless application of the same tests across cultures is desired by no one."

"Some cultural differences in intelligence play out on a global scale. In "The Geography of Thought" (Free Press, 2003), Richard Nisbett, PhD, co-director of the Culture and Cognition Program at the University of Michigan, argues that East Asian and Western cultures have developed cognitive styles that differ in fundamental ways, including in how intelligence is understood."

"practical and academic intelligence can develop independently or even in conflict with each other, and that the values of a culture may shape the direction in which a child develops."

"They also agree with studies in a number of countries, both industrialized and nonindustrialized, that suggest that people who are unable to solve complex problems in the abstract can often solve them when they are presented in a familiar context."

"Are "culture-free" or "culture-fair" intelligence tests possible, or is success on a test inevitably influenced by familiarity with the culture in which the test was developed?

Moreover, is it desirable--or even possible--to adapt Western tests to non-Western cultures, or should new tests be designed from the ground up to measure skills and abilities valued by the culture in which they are to be used?

Many psychologists believe that the idea that a test can be completely absent of cultural bias--a recurrent hope of test developers in the 20th century--is contradicted by the weight of the evidence. Raven's Progressive Matrices, for example, is one of several nonverbal intelligence tests that were originally advertised as "culture free," but are now recognized as culturally loaded.

Patricia Greenfield, PhD, of the University of California, Los Angeles, argues that nonverbal intelligence tests are based on cultural constructs, such as the matrix, that are ubiquitous in some cultures but almost nonexistent in others. In societies where formal schooling is common, she says, students gain an early familiarity with organizing items into rows and columns, which gives them an advantage over test-takers in cultures where formal schooling is rare.

Similarly, says Greenfield, media technologies like television, film and video games give test-takers from cultures where those technologies are widespread an advantage on visual tests, while test-takers from cultures where the language-based media are more common have advantages on verbal tests."
http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb03/intelligent.aspx
"Sternberg, in contrast, has taken a more direct approach to changing the practice of testing. His Sternberg Triarchic Abilities Test (STAT) is a battery of multiple-choice questions that tap into the three independent aspects of intelligence--analytic, practical and creative--proposed in his triarchic theory.

Recently, Sternberg and his collaborators from around the United States completed the first phase of a College Board-sponsored Rainbow Project to put the triarchic theory into practice. The goal of the project was to enhance prediction of college success and increase equity among ethnic groups in college admissions. About 800 college students took the STAT along with performance-based measures of creativity and practical intelligence.

Sternberg and his collaborators found that triarchic measures predicted a significant portion of the variance in college grade point average (GPA), even after SAT scores and high school GPA had been accounted for."

"Should we even be using intelligence tests in the first place?

In certain situations where intelligence tests are currently being used, the consensus answer appears to be "no." A recent report of the President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education (PCESE), for example, suggests that the use of intelligence tests to diagnose learning disabilities should be discontinued.

For decades, learning disabilities have been diagnosed using the "IQ-achievement discrepancy model," according to which children whose achievement scores are a standard deviation or more below their IQ scores are identified as learning disabled.

The problem with that model, says Patti Harrison, PhD, a professor of school psychology at the University of Alabama, is that the discrepancy doesn't tell you anything about what kind of intervention might help the child learn. Furthermore, the child's actual behavior in the classroom and at home is often a better indicator of a child's ability than an abstract intelligence test, so children might get educational services that are more appropriate to their needs if IQ tests were discouraged, she says.

Even staunch supporters of intelligence testing, such as Naglieri and the Kaufmans, believe that the IQ-achievement discrepancy model is flawed."
http://www.apa.org/monitor/feb03/intelligent.aspx

more in depth here :


User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1153
Joined: 10 months ago
Reputation: 1524

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by blackg » 2 weeks ago

I've always been a big believe in street smarts. Nothing will make you look more foolish than naivety.
Let's pay the slaves

User avatar
That Guy
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 773
Joined: 10 months ago
Reputation: 1837
Norwood: NW2.5

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by That Guy » 2 weeks ago

Weird how it's always non-white goys trying to prove how IQ's totally not a real thing.

IQ tests aren't perfect, but there are real, observable differences in average intelligence among the races. Deal with it.

User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

That Guy wrote:
2 weeks ago
Weird how it's always non-white goys trying to prove how IQ's totally not a real thing.

IQ tests aren't perfect, but there are real, observable differences in average intelligence among the races. Deal with it.
I mean how much of a failure and a pathetic excuse of a human you have to be if you have to rely on your race to feel superior and get an ego boost ?


And i wish you'd bother reading a post for one time in your life along with the clown White cucks upvoting you because you're such a pathetic circlejerk together only because you share the same race.

What i meant in my post that Whites many have an advantage in some types of intelligence, but only because IQ focuses on measuring logical/mathematical and spatial intelligence and the test is flawed in several ways as it's culturally insensitive, so people from different cultures/races sometimes aren't able to relate well. And anyways, there're different types of intelligence when Whites aren't necessary superior and even niggers can be above cumskins when it comes to them.

User avatar
JLBB
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 428
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 898
Norwood: NW1
Regimen: 0.25mg Finasteride

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by JLBB » 2 weeks ago

Xexos wrote:
2 weeks ago
I mean how much of a failure and a pathetic excuse of a human you have to be if you have to rely on your race to feel superior and get an ego boost ?


And i wish you'd bother reading a post for one time in your life along with the clown White cucks upvoting you because you're such a pathetic circlejerk together only because you share the same race.

What i meant in my post that Whites many have an advantage in some types of intelligence, but only because IQ focuses on measuring logical/mathematical and spatial intelligence and the test is flawed in several ways as it's culturally insensitive, so people from different cultures/races sometimes aren't able to relate well. And anyways, there're different types of intelligence when Whites aren't necessary superior and even niggers can be above cumskins when it comes to them.
"but only because IQ focuses on measuring logical/mathematical and spatial intelligence and the test is flawed in several ways as it's culturally insensitive, so people from different cultures/races sometimes aren't able to relate well."

Yes, which is why other races tend to be poor at political problem solving and eat grubs and live in mudhuts until Whites or Asians attempt to solve the problems they have. Logical, mathematical and spatial intelligence result in societal advances that are UNIVERSALLY accepted as positive, you can say all you like that other cultures/races aren't able to relate well to IQ testing, yet they most certainly want all the benefits that logical/mathematical intelligence results in.

Physical attributes of other races that result in them being better at certain sports etc typically don't result in benefits that people want to pay money for aside from those at the very top. Logical, mathematical intelligence and general IQ is valued across the board on the very clear basis that it is immensely correlated with earnings potential, because everyone of every background values with their spending habits the skills and benefits that IQ brings.

It's the same issue in migration, EVERYONE of all races and cultures want to live in the West, and EVERYONE again wants all the societal and technological benefits that IQ results in, yet also to pretend that its not important, and that there's nothing special about white Western countries being primarily white,

User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

JLBB wrote:
2 weeks ago
"but only because IQ focuses on measuring logical/mathematical and spatial intelligence and the test is flawed in several ways as it's culturally insensitive, so people from different cultures/races sometimes aren't able to relate well."

Yes, which is why other races tend to be poor at political problem solving and eat grubs and live in mudhuts until Whites or Asians attempt to solve the problems they have. Logical, mathematical and spatial intelligence result in societal advances that are UNIVERSALLY accepted as positive, you can say all you like that other cultures/races aren't able to relate well to IQ testing, yet they most certainly want all the benefits that logical/mathematical intelligence results in.

Physical attributes of other races that result in them being better at certain sports etc typically don't result in benefits that people want to pay money for aside from those at the very top. Logical, mathematical intelligence and general IQ is valued across the board on the very clear basis that it is immensely correlated with earnings potential, because everyone of every background values with their spending habits the skills and benefits that IQ brings.

It's the same issue in migration, EVERYONE of all races and cultures want to live in the West, and EVERYONE again wants all the societal and technological benefits that IQ results in, yet also to pretend that its not important, and that there's nothing special about white Western countries being primarily white,
Politics is bullshit anyways, LOL at you if you take politics seriously to be honest. lefties, right wings, stormfront, liberals are all fucking retarded and have flawed and low IQ ideologies, not to say that you have political problems more than anyone else and you literally KILL each others because you share different opinion/views and you're on the border of a civil war. You're assuming that every other society HAS to live like the White societies or else they're failures. But no thanks, not everyone wants Gay marriage, bestiality, disgusting transsexuals, over 50 genders (lol), and broken homes/single moms to be more common than stable families. As i said in my other post, inventing some cool technologies and building some good looking skyscrapers isn't what it makes a civilization/culture successful or great, that's superficial and retarded. As long as the people in it have the brains and degeneracy of animals and want to go on killing sprees or kill themselves to release their pain or frustration, then you're a failed, disgusting civilization/culture that shouldn't even exist.

We all are different, that's why we need each others. Some people are smart, some are strong, some are wise, some are kind, etc. And that's how every sane society managed to exist, that's how communities work. People helps each others and compensate for what others lack to be able to establish a society. It's not about who is "superior" or has the best quality, because at the end of the day you can't accomplish everything by yourself as you'll never be perfect.

And if Whites are so superior to establish civilizations/cultures with ease, why did you have to enslave niggers and native Americans to be able to establish America ? You're superior, you don't need those losers, right ? Nope, without them America wouldn't have been built.

As i said, no one is DYING to go to the west because you guys are so sweet and superior, but they go to the west because they're DYING in their home countries. Learn the difference and snap out of your delusion that you're somewhat special and others are looking up to you (except maybe self hating ethnic females who love White guys but that's because they're mentally ill), because literally no one gives a shit.

And here are different types of intelligence, if you think that you don't need the other types, then you're seriously retarded and that might explain the downfall of your society.
Image

User avatar
That Guy
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 773
Joined: 10 months ago
Reputation: 1837
Norwood: NW2.5

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by That Guy » 2 weeks ago

Xexos wrote:
2 weeks ago
And if Whites are so superior to establish civilizations/cultures with ease, why did you have to enslave niggers and native Americans to be able to establish America ? You're superior, you don't need those losers, right ? Nope, without them America wouldn't have been built.
HAHAHAHAAAA

Holy shit this kebab is proving the race-IQ realism like you can't imagine.

We didn't enslave bleghs. Bleghs enslaved bleghs and sold them, we just wanted a cheap labor force. Which is responsible for less than 1% of the civilization built over here.

Who do you think built EUROPE, dumbass? Let me guess, you think nibbas or your fellow moslems did? When are Africans gonna build Africa then?

User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

That Guy wrote:
2 weeks ago
HAHAHAHAAAA

Holy shit this kebab is proving the race-IQ realism like you can't imagine.

We didn't enslave bleghs. Bleghs enslaved bleghs and sold them, we just wanted a cheap labor force. Which is responsible for less than 1% of the civilization built over here.

Who do you think built EUROPE, dumbass? Let me guess, you think nibbas or your fellow moslems did? When are Africans gonna build Africa then?
-Firstly, just for your information, laughing and talking sarcastically only proves that you're at the losing side of the argument, and it's honestly a bit embarrassing for your age to debate like that, especially with a person 10 years younger than you.

-Secondly, when will you drop your bad habit ? I mean the habit of not reading what others have to say or only quoting some parts of their posts to respond to and declare yourself the winner like a child. It's like you're afraid to read rational points because you desperately want to stay in your fantasy world and refuse to change your mindset, which is pretty close-minded for a "master-race".

-Thirdly, what you're saying doesn't hold any meaning as there's no evidence other than /pol/ and sites like 4chan. It's a well known fact that most people who enslaved Blacks were Whites and Jews, even if some Blacks enslaved other Blacks, it doesn't mean that you're not guilty yourself (Oh, look somebody made a crime i also made, that means i'm innocent!). You just want to run away from what your ancestors did like a coward instead of facing it and trying to make things better.

Fourthly, i didn't mention Europe in my post, i mentioned America. I never said that Africans or Asians or Muslims or Arabs built Europe, although without them Europeans would most likely be running butt naked as they took everything from Eastern cultures and civilizations.

Fifthly, it doesn't matter who built Europe as it's already failed now as we're seeing how it turned into a degenerate shithole. And keep in mind that blaming others doesn't mean you're innocent yourself. Even if we say the evil Jews and the bad immigrants ruined your countries, well you gave them a chance to do so. You WILLINGLY gave up your morals and religion and WILLINGLY engage into degeneracy and acting like uncivilized animals, you WILLINGLY let your women become whores, you WILLINGLY let your youth go on killing sprees because you can't provide them a decent life, you WILLINGLY follow the Jewish media and social media like sheep without thinking and you let it brainwash you, you WILLINGLY destroyed yourself with your own hands. Stop justifying your weakness and failure and blaming them on others as you weren't FORCED to become like that, but you WILLINGLY chose it.

Have a nice day.

User avatar
JLBB
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 428
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 898
Norwood: NW1
Regimen: 0.25mg Finasteride

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by JLBB » 2 weeks ago

Xexos wrote:
2 weeks ago
Politics is bullshit anyways, LOL at you if you take politics seriously to be honest. lefties, right wings, stormfront, liberals are all fucking retarded and have flawed and low IQ ideologies, not to say that you have political problems more than anyone else and you literally KILL each others because you share different opinion/views and you're on the border of a civil war. You're assuming that every other society HAS to live like the White societies or else they're failures. But no thanks, not everyone wants Gay marriage, bestiality, disgusting transsexuals, over 50 genders (lol), and broken homes/single moms to be more common than stable families. As i said in my other post, inventing some cool technologies and building some good looking skyscrapers isn't what it makes a civilization/culture successful or great, that's superficial and retarded. As long as the people in it have the brains and degeneracy of animals and want to go on killing sprees or kill themselves to release their pain or frustration, then you're a failed, disgusting civilization/culture that shouldn't even exist.

We all are different, that's why we need each others. Some people are smart, some are strong, some are wise, some are kind, etc. And that's how every sane society managed to exist, that's how communities work. People helps each others and compensate for what others lack to be able to establish a society. It's not about who is "superior" or has the best quality, because at the end of the day you can't accomplish everything by yourself as you'll never be perfect.

And if Whites are so superior to establish civilizations/cultures with ease, why did you have to enslave niggers and native Americans to be able to establish America ? You're superior, you don't need those losers, right ? Nope, without them America wouldn't have been built.

As i said, no one is DYING to go to the west because you guys are so sweet and superior, but they go to the west because they're DYING in their home countries. Learn the difference and snap out of your delusion that you're somewhat special and others are looking up to you (except maybe self hating ethnic females who love White guys but that's because they're mentally ill), because literally no one gives a shit.

And here are different types of intelligence, if you think that you don't need the other types, then you're seriously retarded and that might explain the downfall of your society.
Image
404 a shit to give about arguing this not found.

The Don Killuminati is so much better than anything else Tupac put out. Had it on heavy rotation lately.

User avatar
Exodus
Hair Loss Rookie
Hair Loss Rookie
Posts: 191
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 376
Norwood: NW6
Regimen: nothing

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Exodus » 2 weeks ago

JLBB wrote:
2 weeks ago
"but only because IQ focuses on measuring logical/mathematical and spatial intelligence and the test is flawed in several ways as it's culturally insensitive, so people from different cultures/races sometimes aren't able to relate well."

Yes, which is why other races tend to be poor at political problem solving and eat grubs and live in mudhuts until Whites or Asians attempt to solve the problems they have. Logical, mathematical and spatial intelligence result in societal advances that are UNIVERSALLY accepted as positive, you can say all you like that other cultures/races aren't able to relate well to IQ testing, yet they most certainly want all the benefits that logical/mathematical intelligence results in.

Physical attributes of other races that result in them being better at certain sports etc typically don't result in benefits that people want to pay money for aside from those at the very top. Logical, mathematical intelligence and general IQ is valued across the board on the very clear basis that it is immensely correlated with earnings potential, because everyone of every background values with their spending habits the skills and benefits that IQ brings.

It's the same issue in migration, EVERYONE of all races and cultures want to live in the West, and EVERYONE again wants all the societal and technological benefits that IQ results in, yet also to pretend that its not important, and that there's nothing special about white Western countries being primarily white,
quoted for truth

stan still hasnt accepted that whites and asians have invented at least 90% of civilization

with whites making up at least 70 or 80% of that

its just ancient china had a good run with gunpowder, paper, silk, etc. nothing compared to western accomplishments though

as for IQ, you can say it means nothing but the significant positive correlations between it and health, longevity, income, and job performance are hard to ignore.

and its important as a consistent objective metric otherwise we're too prone to just saying that whoever we agree with are the smart ones
Last edited by Exodus 2 weeks ago, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
That Guy
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 773
Joined: 10 months ago
Reputation: 1837
Norwood: NW2.5

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by That Guy » 2 weeks ago

Exodus wrote:
2 weeks ago
quoted for truth

stan still hasnt accepted that whites and asians have invented at least 90% of civilization

with whites making up at least 70 or 80% of that

its just ancient china had a good run with gunpowder, paper, silk, etc. nothing compared to western accomplishments though

as for IQ, you can say it means nothing but the significant positive correlations between it and health, longevity, income, and job performance are hard to ignore.

and its important as a consistent objective metric
Let's just get something out of the way. Stan is full of shit, and he knows it, when he's arguing about why people are going to the west to "escape hell" like he's done before. Firstly, if it's hell, it's because the people there made it that way.

Second, the migrants are coming to Europe purely because Soros-funded NGOs are making all these promises to them and giving them money to pay traffickers to put them on little boats. Because "Man say that I go tuh yoUrup aNd git monies and white wahmen wit da bootyful blon haayer."

Here's a snippet from a documentary speaking to these traffickers that came out recently.



People are going to white countries because white countries are better.

Now, Stan has stated that he likes it where he is, considers us degenerates, etc. So I don't see wtf his problem is. Just stay where you are. Problem solved. But still he is asshurt.

User avatar
Exodus
Hair Loss Rookie
Hair Loss Rookie
Posts: 191
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 376
Norwood: NW6
Regimen: nothing

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Exodus » 2 weeks ago

That Guy wrote:
2 weeks ago
Let's just get something out of the way. Stan is full of shit, and he knows it, when he's arguing about why people are going to the west to "escape hell" like he's done before. Firstly, if it's hell, it's because the people there made it that way.

Second, the migrants are coming to Europe purely because Soros-funded NGOs are making all these promises to them and giving them money to pay traffickers to put them on little boats. Because "Man say that I go tuh yoUrup aNd git monies and white wahmen wit da bootyful blon haayer."

Here's a snippet from a documentary speaking to these traffickers that came out recently.



People are going to white countries because white countries are better.

Now, Stan has stated that he likes it where he is, considers us degenerates, etc. So I don't see wtf his problem is. Just stay where you are. Problem solved. But still he is asshurt.
i like stan but on this topic he is very biased for obvious reasons.

User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

Exodus wrote:
2 weeks ago
quoted for truth

stan still hasnt accepted that whites and asians have invented at least 90% of civilization

with whites making up at least 70 or 80% of that

its just ancient china had a good run with gunpowder, paper, silk, etc. nothing compared to western accomplishments though

as for IQ, you can say it means nothing but the significant positive correlations between it and health, longevity, income, and job performance are hard to ignore.

and its important as a consistent objective metric otherwise we're too prone to just saying that whoever we agree with are the smart ones
You're not White though and you have no White blood inside you. You're half Jewish, half Asian.

If you honestly like to be a dog to the Whites because you have no self esteem and hate yourself with passion, so the only way for you to feel like a human being is by being a slave to others who accomplish things, then go for it.

Added in 2 minutes 14 seconds:
That Guy wrote:
2 weeks ago
Let's just get something out of the way. Stan is full of shit, and he knows it, when he's arguing about why people are going to the west to "escape hell" like he's done before. Firstly, if it's hell, it's because the people there made it that way.

Second, the migrants are coming to Europe purely because Soros-funded NGOs are making all these promises to them and giving them money to pay traffickers to put them on little boats. Because "Man say that I go tuh yoUrup aNd git monies and white wahmen wit da bootyful blon haayer."

Here's a snippet from a documentary speaking to these traffickers that came out recently.



People are going to white countries because white countries are better.

Now, Stan has stated that he likes it where he is, considers us degenerates, etc. So I don't see wtf his problem is. Just stay where you are. Problem solved. But still he is asshurt.
You aren't even able to quote my posts and respond to the arguments i made and you had to wait for your loyal mixed-race dog to save you and then quote him to insult me because i've hurt both your ego and your ideologies.

I honestly feel sorry for you, such a sad case.

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1541
Joined: 10 months ago
Reputation: 3357
Norwood: NW2.5
Regimen: - 5% Minoxidil once a day and Adenosin shampoo
- Discontinued due to lack of results: Stemoxydine and dermarolling
Location: Belgium
Age: 29
Contact:

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Admin » 2 weeks ago

Damn right there are different forms of intelligence, only this morning I've practiced:

- My 'making breakfast' intelligence
- My 'personal grooming' intelligence
- My 'podcast listening' intelligence
- My 'Facebook comment posting' intelligence
- My 'Impact of Hair Loss moderation' intelligence

And this afternoon I'll practice my piano and video game playing intelligence.

Don't discriminate against the numerous noble forms of intelligence out there you bigots.

Seriously though, I'm sorry but I have nothing but sarcasm and ridicule to give to fight the attempts out there to fight the most basic and undeniable observable realities out there. I knew Nicholas Nassim Taleb would be mentioned in this thread. Jordan Peterson and many other respectable scholars have already blown his weak arguments out of the water time and time again:


User avatar
Xexos
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Hair Loss Enthusiast
Posts: 308
Joined: 9 months ago
Reputation: 452
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: Finasteride 1.25 MG ED .. Tea Tree Shampoo 3x a week
Age: 19

Re: IQ is pseudoscience that doesn't mean anything

Post by Xexos » 2 weeks ago

Admin wrote:
2 weeks ago
Damn right there are different forms of intelligence, only this morning I've practiced:

- My 'making breakfast' intelligence
- My 'personal grooming' intelligence
- My 'podcast listening' intelligence
- My 'Facebook comment posting' intelligence
- My 'Impact of Hair Loss moderation' intelligence

And this afternoon I'll practice my piano and video game playing intelligence.

Don't discriminate against the numerous noble forms of intelligence out there you bigots.

Seriously though, I'm sorry but I have nothing but sarcasm and ridicule to give to fight the attempts out there to fight the most basic and undeniable observable realities out there. I knew Nicholas Nassim Taleb would be mentioned in this thread. Jordan Peterson and many other respectable scholars have already blown his weak arguments out of the water time and time again:

Again Jordan Peterson ? Your obsession with that guy is not healthy and you insert his ass in every argument like he's a saint who knows about everything and says nothing wrong.

Keep worshipping your Messiah Jordan Peterson the kike, father of an Instagram slut, who certainly knows about everything because he can fool idiots like you with ease as he's too smart with words.

Image

Image

This forum has become seriously disgusting, certainly much more worse than HairLossTalk. I wonder if Wolf Pack was truly the bad guy or some people here were just so annoying and stupid and wanted to make some drama for no reason. So far those "Wolf Pack's enemies" are either stupid or childish or trollish or annoying or all of them combined.

If this keeps going on i'll just remove my Discord server because i don't want to have a server associated with a circlejerk stupid forum like that, you can make your own new "White master-race" server if you want. And make sure it's as much as a circlejerk as this forum.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest