Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Discuss everything else: politics, society, culture, science, philosophy, ideas, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
rclark
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1079
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1179
Norwood: NW4
Regimen: Finasteride 1 mg daily, Progesterone 2% (22mg daily), Minoxidil 15% hair growth only).
Using 1.5 mm needle on all bald/balding areas weekly.

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by rclark » 5 months ago

blackg wrote:
5 months ago
Watch out for the Sudanese.
That's a really sexy avatar you got there.

Would rather be a Norwood six, or her?

User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1238
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1654

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by blackg » 5 months ago

rclark wrote:
5 months ago
That's a really sexy avatar you got there.

Would rather be a Norwood six, or her?
All I can say is thank god for plus size bikinis.
I eat ass (taxpayer funded)

User avatar
JasonStatham
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 915
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 2022
Norwood: NW3.5

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by JasonStatham » 5 months ago



@That Guy.

Black people in aerodynamics.

User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1238
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1654

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by blackg » 5 months ago

JasonStatham wrote:
5 months ago


@ThatGuy

Black people in aerodynamics.
Opportunistic crap! Yeah, like many amateur white citizens haven't tried the same thing over the years.
I eat ass (taxpayer funded)

User avatar
JLBB
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 516
Joined: 11 months ago
Reputation: 1083
Norwood: NW1
Regimen: 0.25mg Finasteride

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by JLBB » 5 months ago

blackg wrote:
5 months ago
Opportunistic crap! Yeah, like many amateur white citizens haven't tried the same thing over the years.
I often don't know whether to downvote or upvote your posts.

User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1238
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1654

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by blackg » 5 months ago

JeanLucBB wrote:
5 months ago
I often don't know whether to downvote or upvote your posts.
Thanks. I aim for confusion.
I eat ass (taxpayer funded)

User avatar
JasonStatham
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 915
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 2022
Norwood: NW3.5

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by JasonStatham » 5 months ago

JeanLucBB wrote:
5 months ago
I often don't know whether to downvote or upvote your posts.
I wonder if blackg can function in real life and switch the forum character off or if he is confusing everyone in his life as well.

User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1611
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 3570
Norwood: NW2.5
Regimen: - 5% Minoxidil once a day and Adenosin shampoo
- Discontinued due to lack of results: Stemoxydine and dermarolling
Location: Belgium
Age: 29
Contact:

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by Admin » 5 months ago

JasonStatham wrote:
5 months ago
I wonder if blackg can function in real life and switch the forum character off or if he is confusing everyone in his life as well.
I've been wondering the same. This kind of mind virus is hard to turn off, most people will get angry at you if you pull out this shit too often. And I've noticed that people will often try this nonsense on you when they're feeling angry or resentful.

It depends on the person, but it often doesn't take much: "Yeah but that doesn't mean anything, sometimes it's not true!" The best strategy when it happens is to eject from the conversation. Any negative reaction will feed this dysfunctional behavior, which is why many members here have or have had cuckg on ignore (or added as foe on this forum).

When you're blackg on a forum like this one, it's likely that you'll be triggered by every other post. The kind of shit is funny only when the person sends a clear signal that they're fucking with you. It can be hard to tell online, but yeah, if you assume that blackg is not serious, the above was quite funny. "I aim for confusion", way too true :lol: .

User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1238
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1654

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by blackg » 5 months ago

JasonStatham wrote:
5 months ago
I wonder if blackg can function in real life and switch the forum character off or if he is confusing everyone in his life as well.
The only confusion I generate in real life is one of sexual orientation.
I eat ass (taxpayer funded)

User avatar
JasonStatham
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 915
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 2022
Norwood: NW3.5

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by JasonStatham » 5 months ago

blackg wrote:
5 months ago
The only confusion I generate in real life is one of sexual orientation.
And here goes my offer away to drink a beer with you

User avatar
blackg
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1238
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1654

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by blackg » 5 months ago

JasonStatham wrote:
5 months ago
And here goes my offer away to drink a beer with you
If you ever come to Australia then I will correct my sexuality so we can have a beer.
I eat ass (taxpayer funded)

User avatar
Afro_Vacancy
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1145
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 2991
Norwood: NW2
Regimen: 1 ml of 5% liquid minoxidil, includes ~20 mg of RU58841 58841; nizoral 3x/week, dermarolling (1.5 mm) 1x/week

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by Afro_Vacancy » 5 months ago

JeanLucBB wrote:
5 months ago
Also Michael Haneke is not outright considered the worlds most respected director by virtually anyone whether they be mainstream or independent/arthouse oriented. At least not in an even remotely absolutist sense like you use. Certainly considered one of the modern greats, but in no way is your representation justified anywhere. He also has his share of films that have been loathed or viewed as mediocre aesthetically, thematically and as individual experiences by virtually the entire film community. Nor can one consider where he resides in film and media culture a position of power (lmfao).
It is not true, in my observation, that Haneke is not considered an elite filmmaker. Perhaps I overstretched by ranking him that high, but from speaking with other film snobs he is always in the conversation as among the very best. You are the first person not to rank him so. To leave aside my own personal experience, Amour is objectively perfect, and won BFI's best film the year that it came out.

Leaving that aside though, you have made a fundamental error in judgment. You have actually argued that he cannot be a great filmmakers on the basis that he has made films that are not great. You are dismissing genius on the premise that there has been failure. That is not valid at all. The great geniuses actually fail more than everybody else.

In contrast, consistency is often a sign of mediocrity, for example Marvel Studios. They've made 20 movies and none of them are loathed -- that makes Kevin Feige the most consistent filmmaker in history. It doesn't make him the best though.

********

You also miss the point. You can feel free to rank whoever you consider to be the best 5 or 10 filmmakers alive today. Put in your honest opinion. I guarantee you that they will not all be Jewish as was argued by several people here, who actually thought that. In fact, there might be 1 or 2 Jews on it.

None of my favorite filmmakers are Jewish.

******

I used to play Age of Empires II online. It was a great experience. I was a world-class player at one point :-) Everybody knew who I was.

I'm afraid to think of how badly and quickly I'd be destroyed if I were to log on to steam right now.

User avatar
That Guy
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 952
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 2006
Norwood: NW2.5

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by That Guy » 5 months ago

Relevant:

Image

I could never get into strategy games to be honest. I was especially shit at Starcraft.

User avatar
rclark
Hair Loss Guru
Hair Loss Guru
Posts: 1079
Joined: 1 year ago
Reputation: 1179
Norwood: NW4
Regimen: Finasteride 1 mg daily, Progesterone 2% (22mg daily), Minoxidil 15% hair growth only).
Using 1.5 mm needle on all bald/balding areas weekly.

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by rclark » 5 months ago

blackg wrote:
5 months ago
The only confusion I generate in real life is one of sexual orientation.
What do you mean? Your avatar is very masculine. There's nothing
feminine about it.

We don't have to "wonder" about what is "down under".

User avatar
JLBB
Hair Loss Expert
Hair Loss Expert
Posts: 516
Joined: 11 months ago
Reputation: 1083
Norwood: NW1
Regimen: 0.25mg Finasteride

Re: Africans have never built a major enduring city in 3000 years

Post by JLBB » 5 months ago

Afro_Vacancy wrote:
5 months ago
It is not true, in my observation, that Haneke is not considered an elite filmmaker. Perhaps I overstretched by ranking him that high, but from speaking with other film snobs he is always in the conversation as among the very best. You are the first person not to rank him so. To leave aside my own personal experience, Amour is objectively perfect, and won BFI's best film the year that it came out.

Leaving that aside though, you have made a fundamental error in judgment. You have actually argued that he cannot be a great filmmakers on the basis that he has made films that are not great. You are dismissing genius on the premise that there has been failure. That is not valid at all. The great geniuses actually fail more than everybody else.

In contrast, consistency is often a sign of mediocrity, for example Marvel Studios. They've made 20 movies and none of them are loathed -- that makes Kevin Feige the most consistent filmmaker in history. It doesn't make him the best though.

********

You also miss the point. You can feel free to rank whoever you consider to be the best 5 or 10 filmmakers alive today. Put in your honest opinion. I guarantee you that they will not all be Jewish as was argued by several people here, who actually thought that. In fact, there might be 1 or 2 Jews on it.

None of my favorite filmmakers are Jewish.

******

I used to play Age of Empires II online. It was a great experience. I was a world-class player at one point :-) Everybody knew who I was.

I'm afraid to think of how badly and quickly I'd be destroyed if I were to log on to steam right now.
" You have actually argued that he cannot be a great filmmakers on the basis that he has made films that are not great. "

I agree with what you're saying but its different to my overall thought that I was trying to convey, to elaborate he doesn't tend to be held as the "greatest" because aesthetically and thematically his films are so different over the past two decades (and often in distinct periods) so most critics tend to gravitate towards specific examples rather than his filmography as a whole. Also specific films are outright hated which is rare for other major critical darlings and a reasonably large number think he is a bore, overrated, overly simplistic in terms of ideas, or just cold and inhuman. I don't agree with any of those on the whole, but he doesn't have mass appeal even in critical circles because his films have a tendency to provoke those reactions. Also in saying all the above this I'm only giving possible explanation for why he's not considered a choice for number one by a majority in critical circles rather than arguing this as a reason why he isn't, separate also to my personal thoughts on him as a director in which I know its not a valid argument that hes made some blunders. He is widely considered a great and likely to be mentioned in a top 5 by many but a minority would likely place him at the top and even many serious critics loathe or are indifferent to him on the whole.

"r. Perhaps I overstretched by ranking him that high, but from speaking with other film snobs he is always in the conversation as among the very best. "

This made me laugh, its often the same case from who I talk to in terms of noob-level uni students who haven't actually seen that much arthouse cinema nor have they researched or studied it in depth. Lars Von Trier and Paul Thomas Anderson being the other two that are consistently mentioned by people who are in the same boat of not being particularly knowledgeable about cinema, but are happy to flaunt the cinephile/film snob title. Obviously that's not an argument against their work because both personally and critically they are considered top-tier, but just as an observation people with broader horizons tend to go for more obscure choices (but do mention these others, while often repeating what I've just said about them being overly mentioned by people who aren't knowledgeable). Also the lesser knowledgeable cinephiles ALWAYS mention Amour which is hilarious, although it is a great film. The more esoteric or emotionally explosive/shocking films tend to do the best in critic and serious cinephile circles: Cache (his most critically successful over the years), The White Ribbon, The Piano Teacher (maybe my favourite) and Code Unknown. Amour being more straightforward and having won the Palme D'or makes it more popular among noobies who don't feel secure in offering greatest praise to something like Cache but want to be part of the herd regardless.


I also agree that in terms of filmmaking there is virtually no discernible Jewish influence beyond their numbers in the population, but there certainly is in banking and news media for example both of which have a hugely more important influence on peoples lives. I don't think there are any Jewish filmakers in my top 20, and Spielberg is the only one I can think of that might be in critical circles and in terms of box office, although he's not seen at the very top echelon of directors among most critics to be honest.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests