Conservatives want immigration from the third world but legally.pjhair wrote: ↑2 months agoIt's of course disgusting to support immigration with an aim to eradicate the native population. However, just because some lunatic Jewish writer may have supported this idea it doesn't mean you can simply hold all Jews responsible. In order to place culpability on Jews you would have to show the following two things:
(1) Jews in general support support uncontrolled immigration because they want to eradicate native European population.
(2) Judaism endorses such a belief.
Remember, just showing that most Jews in the west support multiculturalism is not enough. People may support multiculturalism for benign reasons as well. For example, they genuinely enjoy living with people from different cultures.
Where is the data to support your theory? I have never heard of prominent conservative thinkers claiming that their aim is demographic replacement. What evidence do you have to support your claim that conservative's in general have this appalling aim?
i strongly disagree with you here. Perhaps you want to live in a country that only grants citizenship to whites. There is nothing wrong with that. You are free to choose what kind of country you want to live in. It's your house so you make the rules. If tomorrow Japan decides that they only want to grant citizenship to people of east Asian ethnicity, I would have no problem with that either. However, the problem with your vision is that many of your fellow white men/women don't share it. At least not in North America. They do want to live in a more diverse society. As you live in the same country as them, they should have a say in the matter as well. So what do you think should happen? Should white North American countries further get divided between countries that want a diverse population and countries that don't? Or do you advocate just taking over these countries by force and implement your vision? Or perhaps you believe that white men/women who DO want to live in diverse population are minuscule in number. If so, can you show me data that supports your claim?
Thing that woke me up to cons was when I saw it pointed out by a number of people that there have been an equal number of democrat and republican presidents now since ww2, but for some baffling reason, only one side of the political spectrum has got what they want. Think about that. Everything has steered hard left no matter who is in power.
Look at how conservatives counter signal to prove how totally not racist they are and shit. They want to get "the black/hispanic/muslim, etc." vote and will literally propose strategies for how they can get these demographics to vote for them. Yet, they never get those demographics voting for them (as I've shown) because the left explicitly panders to that demographic.
Second of all, there is absolutely no evidence anywhere that anyone but the most subverted of SJWs actually "wants" more "diversity". There was never, and you will find no example, of homogeneous countries in the past ever wanting more foreigners. Because why the hell would you? Most want fewer immigrants as I linked a few pages back.
Strange how all these "enriched" white countries are starting to riot. Strange how once you live among these foreigners and not in an ivory tower, you begin to realize how shit this is.
Nobody in the public ever voted directly in favor of these policies and you can ONLY vote for these policies in America and Canada. Multiculturalism only exists in the west and exists purely to provide an unending source of voters for politicians and labor for business. Full stop.
Lastly, even if people "want" something it doesn't mean that thing is good. Most people, on paper, would want universal basic incomes, state-funded everything, etc. but guess what? It's still a bad idea in practice.