First, I'm only skimming your posts right now. That is not personal and is what I do when reading flame wars, and I remember I used to always scroll down the page when you and Admin were going at it. The only people I find readable in flame wars are those who have a very good sense of humor. Remember Macaroni? He would own all of us in a flame war. You have a good and effective writing style for technical and descriptive writing, but you're simply not as effective for snark, etc. For whatever it's worth, that I think that largely applies to my writing style as well. I think that it also applies to Admin, Rudiger, and Pj.Doc wrote: ↑2 weeks agoWhat a pointless post. "I know him, he's good" all the way from Egypt to Norway You're a shit tier dumb poster - earth is flat etc. Reminds me of the clueless aunt, uncle John was good, the kids always loved him, this is a shock to us.
Yeah man, totally normal, lets say I'm angry today. I'll do a sexualised voiceover in relation to someone's daughter or dogs fucking girls. JLBB has been angry sure, so have I but this was where his inner deviancy came out. ThatGuy may have denied the holocaust even on HairLossTalk as a Nazi but he isn't about to invent some machine and gas people - he simply can't do much thankfully. The problem here is I believe laws have already been broken. Of course I can't prove it which is why I said I'll leave it.
Added in 4 minutes 53 seconds:
I didn't even know Pat wrote much in that thread? I thought it was just another two people. There is no revenge. I am not criticising all areas of his life or bullying his very existence.
I asked you about those 2 scenarios - I like the way no one has addressed it but just said "lay off, he's a friend, he's been bullied." Ah okay, that's alright then to post about dogs fucking girls (animal abuse too) and a voiceover against a young girl (child abuse). Afro himself called it creepy but of course will remain silent now. You all see it as normal because he's your "friend" on here, for neutrals this would be horrifying.
I also told you I've said it now and I'm not going to bring it up anymore. Yet why do you keep asking me? I've been crystal clear why I brought it up. It was a question of morals and I know he won't ever give a truthful answer so that's the end of that. I will no longer message him even in his reply.
Now, while skimming your post, I saw that you mentioned Pat's post from a few week ago, about women fucking dogs. It's not a good supporting argument. There were posters who disagreed with Pat and wrote about it, at the very least Exodus did. I disagreed with Pat, though I don't remember if I posted about it. I had also discussed dogs with Pat at a previous occasion. I believe that Pat is mistaken in what he wrote, but I'm not going to hate him for all eternity for it and flame him on unrelated subjects. I also have empathy for him writing that because it reminds me of something else, that I'll expand on if there's a request.
I agree that "normals" would be horrified by Pat's post, but I don't give that much weight, and neither should you. Being "normal" isn't about having a superior or greater empathy, it's about having a statistically standard empathy, where the composition of the circle of inclusion is specific to your time and place. Normal people care about dogs -- which is good and I love dogs -- but there are a whole bunch of other situations/groups/beings that they don't give a shit about. For example Pat wrote that there's nothing wrong with living in a basement. It can happen due to any sort of reasons. For making that comment, we can say that Pat is not statistically normal. In a lot of normal society, it is not only ok but in fact good to laugh at people living in a basement.
You have one legit complaint about Pat. You're saying that he made a voiceover where he threatened your family. I don't remember this happening, but that sounds really awful. We're all a little afraid of being doxxed here, or of being exposed, and having someone use video or voice to make an attack makes the forum feel more real and thus more threatening. You would be more effective, and more convincing, if you simply focused on that, something like this:
"Pat, your voiceover really bothered me. I'm relieved that it's deleted now. Please don't do that again."
"You fucking pedophile Incel, here's a video of a British person who raped 136 people, I'm going to close your account since you no longer need it."
Aside from losing your own anger, at that point you place the ball squarely in Pat's court. If he makes another video or voice recording, he will look awful.
And in my opinion, you can end the argument by rescinding his ban.