Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoWhen I read this I just had to take a deep breath and then walk away, because it's so insane I don't even know where to start. I can only assume others read the first few sentences and couldn't take anymore (and I don't blame them, I literally wanted to stop reading).
"The student even admits he was doing it to show the Native American he won't get pushed around."
What the actual fuck? The most annoying thing is that you phrase it as if he's "admitting" something shocking. You mean the 16 year old kid "even admitted" he didn't want to get abused in public by an adult bullying him?
"The person who had the drum beat in their face even states himself he was smirking to show the Native American he wouldn't be bullied."
Oh did he "even" state that himself? That he was going to stand up to a bully? How awful of him! What the fuck is wrong with you?
What?Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoBut this isn't correct anyway (you can't get anything right), it wasn't initially about smirking to stand up for himself or anything, he was confused as to what the fuck this old meth head Indian guy was doing walking right up to him and beating a drum in his face, so he thought smiling would diffuse the situation as a welcoming gesture. And I know that sounds far fetched, but remember that the kids initially joined in on the drumming by dancing to the beat of it, most of the boys thought the Indian was actually joining in with them (many even thought this afterwards, as they didn't notice the stare down, some of them didn't know there was intimidation until it hit the news). The kid quickly realises the Indian is not being friendly, he's walked right up in to his personal space, and bangs a drum inches away from a minor's face. And you think that's alright.
Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoThe kid is clearly nervous, he's flinching and blinking as Dances with Meth beats away and yelps in front of him, I mean just watch the fucking thing again. The Indian guy is about to walk past Nick Sandmann, he's walking across another boy who is in front of Sandmann, he then locks eyes, deliberately turns to the right, and walks 3 or 4 feet directly in to his face, and stops at that spot, making no attempt to move past him or around him.
No attempt was made to get around the boy, and no attempt was made by Sandmann to stop him - he didn't move to either side as you would to "block" someone, he didn't put his arms or elbows or shoulders out in any particular direction, he stood completely still and didn't lean forward or anything. He could not have been more passive.
Go to 17:30. Are you actually telling me that boy blocked him? And you're also telling me Sandmann did not seem remotely intimidated?
Oh no, not another edit!Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoEdit: I actually watched it again and it's even worse than I thought. Firstly, at 18:30 the Indian guy moves to the left of the boy, and there's space to pass through (there's another angle of this) and he doesn't, he stops again and gets louder and beats harder, and even closer to the boy. Can you see how wrong you are about how he was intentionally blocking the Indian? He clearly doesn't fucking move as the Indian guy moves to get past, there is zero intention of trying to stop him. Then it gets particularly bad, look how closely he drums to the boys face at 18:38, notice how he's also chanting louder, and beating harder as well. He's pissed off the boy was not intimidated, so he's getting louder and more intimidating, exactly what a bully does. If your tactic doesn't work initially, go harder. And remember we're talking about a grown man, and a child here, but still this is all justified in your fucked up mind. Are you telling me around 18:38 that he's not intentionally intimidating the boy, are you telling me that the boy does not look a bit scared and nervous? At 18:53 the camera drops a little and you can see Sandmann has his hands together behind his back, WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? This is blocking and intimidation? (end of Edit)
It's a youtube video. No reading skills needed!Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoBut your reading comprehension is absolutely abysmal. Even though Nathan Phillips did intimidate that boy, I was clearly talking about the Black Hebrew Israelites who were hurling abuse at the boys for a few hours before the incident, they were even abusing Phillips and his Indian friends as well. Phillips' ridiculous reason for walking up to the boys is because he felt they were being racist to the black guys and chanting "build the wall" (which is widely debunked as un-true, and you haven't said a word about that). I was in the middle of talking about them being intimidating, and somehow you thought I meant Phillips? I just re-read it again and have no idea how you came to that, unless you're on acid or something.
What would Jesus do in this situation?Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoDon't give me these fucking diversionary truism's like "it's true that the boy didn't curse at him- I'll give you that" fucking DUH, I never suggested you said that, how absolutely pointless of you to "admit" something that was never debated or in doubt.
"He states he did it to save the kids from the racist words thrown by the other group. "
No, no, just no (ugh jesus fucking christ this is so hard) he said he was intervening to stop the kids from being racist to the black guys, you could not have got more mixed up here. He said he heard "build a wall" chants, directed at the Black Israelites, and that doesn't even make sense. Does he think the border wall is separating America from the sub-Saharan?
So would you describe your stupidity as finite then? What number would you rateRudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoBut I mean, your utter stupidity is infinite, it really is. You're claiming the Indian guy is saying he was saving the Covington boys from racist abuse, you're actually saying this. What the fuck is your mind? I've never heard anyone claim such a stupid thing, it's actually fucking warped.
"The whole point is they were taking a day off of school, and marching around the white house when government was shutdown, on a
school day (Friday)."
How many beers later did you write that?
Do you read some of the paragraphs you write, or do you just type out whatever comes to your mind?Rudiger wrote: ↑1 week agoSo I ask again, what did they actually do wrong? I'm not saying you're claiming they did something illegal, or that you're saying they cursed or were abusive, but you repeatedly talk about them negatively and what they did was disrespectful. When asked for specifics, you say the boy "blocked" him, that's now completely debunked and ripped apart, so now what? Are you going to scramble to think of some other reason it must be wrong? Because they wore MAGA hats and you don't know how to deal with that?
Because that's all this is about, that's the only reason you hate them in such a biased way. I really just wanted to write all this and get to the bottom of your reasoning, because you have the mentality and simple mindedness of a fucking child, Ironically you kept saying "just watch the whole video" in a way that's like "just think for yourself, mane" when you fail so badly at doing this, because they wear MAGA hats, your bias has taken 100% control of you, and that would terrify me if I felt so disconnected from any form of reason or logic. What a fucking retard. Fuck you.
The MAGA hats? I don't know if you're even joking when you say that. Really? It was because I saw them
where MAGA hats.
That thought came to you because?