Afro_Vacancy wrote: ↑
Sat Oct 06, 2018 11:21 pm
What I have not done, and will not do in the future, is always comprehensively respond to your long and unstructured posts which include dozens of separate points. I am not being paid to post here, and I have no responsibility to give you indefinite and undivided attention. Should I choose to respond to you, I will either respond to the points that I consider the most interesting, or the ones that I suspect that you consider the most important.
The post that I'm quoting is a good example. It would take me several hours to look up each of your claims. Meanwhile you did not actually consider nor ponder anything that I took time to write out to you, you merely scanned through my post and looked for opportunities to engage in flame wars.
So I guess you're just dropping deliberately quoting my post like that?
Your list did not deserve a decent response, the question was about why you are so certain and why you speak about Kavanaugh as a rapist as if it's a fact. Your first point was fucking "she's got nothing to lose so why not ey?!" I actually didn't intend to reply to any of it at all because it had no respect towards the actual question. Just like with cutting that quote short, you just care how it looks to others, so you wrote a big 13 point list as if "look I had all these valid points just sitting here the whole time". Most of them were total filler, but as long as you look good that's all that matters.
And just because they were "organised" in to points does not mean it was particularly coherent, the points overlapped as well.
If you struggle with googling the 2 or 3 (at most) simple points I made in my post then that's down to you, not me. Like I say, I wasn't even assed replying to any of it, so I could have dissected it a lot more if your list wasn't so unconvincing.
It would take several hours to reply to my dozens of points? Is this like how there was a top 25 concerns about Kavanaugh? But of course that's a "round number" (wtf?) so of course us dummies should have known a very specific number was of course facetious, none of the blame is on you and your consistent exaggerating Dave.
I just re-read my post and it includes 3 simple points on Kavanaugh, all of them you can Google and verify just from headlines and opening paragraphs, from even CNN or MSNBC (one of them about Ford's ex boyfriend was only reported by Fox and right wing news) what are you actually fucking talking about with my "dozens" of whacky points? And oddly you're whining I didn't reply to all of your points yet also whining that I posted dozens of points that you'd have to slave over for several hours to get to. Do you actually re-read your nonsense before posting it?
I know I'm doing something right when I'm replying in very simple terms and because you have fucking nothing to come back with you're acting like "how can anyone get to the bottom of all these crazy things you're saying! This bottomless pit of confusing unstructured insanity!" You're deliberately trying to act confused because you have no response. Now you're being typical high and mighty David "I shall choose what content of yours is worthy of my responses which are in good conscience" lol fuck off, my posts can be exhausting at times but that was not one of those times. You're just trying to belittle me with talking about unstructured points and how I only exist to seek out flame wars, you probably think this leaves you with no faults.
You started by poking me and then responded in typical David fashion about my temper tantrum, blatant tactic of winding someone up and then sitting back and acting all calm and collected, most of this exchange has been trademark you.
A good example:
I never suggested nor implied that his work on the Patriot act makes him a rapist.
Afro_Vacancy wrote: ↑
Sat Oct 06, 2018 4:19 pm
3) The case against Kavanaugh includes issues such that he is more likely an attempted rapist than not;
his backers were afraid to conduct a proper FBI investigation as they didn't interview the majority of the people who were either stated to be witnesses or who have come forth; he committed perjury on multiple counts that are not trivial; he is a rabid partisan; he shares responsibility for the Patriot Act and can thus be considered an enemy of civil liberties; etc
. Edited to add: I forgot an important one, Kavamaugh is an advocate of increased presidential power;
Not only did you include the Patriot Act as one of the issues that "makes him more likely a rapist than not" but you also felt that perjury and being a partisan makes him a rapist, it's even more ridiculous than I remember. You even fucking went back to edit! And why? Being an advocate of increased presidential power makes someone a rapist. You had to go out of your way to include that.
You lied about me saying you only had one argument and that being a "false statement", you never owned up to that. You've just lied again because you actually did say in no uncertain terms, in the same run-on list of a sentence, that the Patriot Act makes him a rapist, and you implied I invented this. Of course you won't own up to that either, you'll just move on to some other bullshit.
I've addressed why I wouldn't apologize to you because I believe you deliberately ignore some points and focus on others, and now you're deliberately clouding my points in smoke in mirrors in the most confusing way "Rudiger you didn't even respond to my ridiculous list of reasons that weren't at all convincing! Yet at the same time you replied too much with your dozens of points that take several hours to Google!!!"
But I don't think you have a leg to stand on with 2 times (at least) that you've definitely lied here, imagine how much you'd be whining and demanding an apology if you had caught me out like that.